Perceptions of faculty and academic leaders regarding the assessment of competencies in higher education: Consensus and dissension

Juana María Tierno-García, Georgeta Ion, Elena Cano-García, Maite Fernández-Ferrer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

© Common Ground Publishing, Juana-María Tierno-García, Georgeta Ion, Elena Cano-García, Maite Fernández-Ferrer, All Rights Reserved. The first promotions of university graduates within the framework of the European Higher Education Area provide an opportunity to study how the shift towards competency-based designs has been produced, and, in particular, what type of evaluation activities have been the most used and their impact on students' learning. This article presents a study undertaken with 165 faculty members and seventeen academic leaders belonging to seven Spanish public universities and four different degrees in order to find points of agreement and disagreement with regard to competencyevaluation. The results show that there is a consensus between the faculty members and academic leaders regarding the evaluation with respect to the most appropriate methodologies and concerning the importance of continuous evaluation. There is also agreement with respect to the obstacles identified: the necessity for cultural change and teacher training, particularly with regard to evaluation, and, finally, the lack of involvement of the stakeholders.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-41
JournalInternational Journal of Educational Organization and Leadership
Volume23
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016

Keywords

  • Academic leaders
  • Assessment
  • Competencies
  • Faculty
  • Higher education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perceptions of faculty and academic leaders regarding the assessment of competencies in higher education: Consensus and dissension'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this