Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions

R. Muradian, M. Arsel, L. Pellegrini, F. Adaman, B. Aguilar, B. Agarwal, E. Corbera, D. Ezzine de Blas, J. Farley, G. Froger, E. Garcia-Frapolli, E. Gómez-Baggethun, J. Gowdy, N. Kosoy, J. F. Le Coq, P. Leroy, P. May, P. Méral, P. Mibielli, R. NorgaardB. Ozkaynak, U. Pascual, W. Pengue, M. Perez, D. Pesche, R. Pirard, J. Ramos-Martin, L. Rival, F. Saenz, G. Van Hecken, A. Vatn, B. Vira, K. Urama

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

283 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this commentary we critically discuss the suitability of payments for ecosystem services and the most important challenges they face. While such instruments can play a role in improving environmental governance, we argue that over-reliance on payments as win-win solutions might lead to ineffective outcomes, similar to earlier experience with integrated conservation and development projects. Our objective is to raise awareness, particularly among policy makers and practitioners, about the limitations of such instruments and to encourage a dialogue about the policy contexts in which they might be appropriate. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)274-279
JournalConservation Letters
Volume6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2013

Keywords

  • Ecosystem services
  • Enviromental governace
  • Integrated conservation and development projects
  • Market-based policy tools
  • Payments for ecosystem services

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this