Patient-centered pharmacovigilance: A review

Hager Ali Saleh; Annie Fourrier-Réglat; Eduard Diogène

doi:10.4314/tjpr.v17i1.24

Patient-centered pharmacovigilance: A review

Hager Ali Saleh, Annie Fourrier-Réglat, Eduard Diogène

Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › Research › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© Pharmacotherapy Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin, Benin City, 300001 Nigeria. Purpose: To determine through a literature review, the current status of patients’ involvement in adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reporting. Methods: Eighteen (18) studies which were published within the period from 2010 to 2016 were reviewed. The studies were extracted from seven databases, viz, Google Scholars, Medline, Academic Search Complete “EBSCO”, Health and Medical Complete ProQuest, Science Direct- Elsevier, SCOPUS and Wiley Online Library. Results: The review revealed that although the reports by patients were of good quality, the patients’ awareness of, and attitude towards, ADR reporting were generally poor. Conclusion: The results of this review suggest the need for patients’ enlightenment on ADRs reporting. Information on how to improve ADRs reporting is provided.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	179-188
Journal	Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research
Volume	17
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v17i1.24
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2018

Keywords

Adverse drug reaction
Patient-centered pharmacovigilance
Patients’ reporting
Systematic review

Access to Document

10.4314/tjpr.v17i1.24

Cite this

@article{0bb6ce167cd147e485d8dc6cd3afc5b7,

title = "Patient-centered pharmacovigilance: A review",

abstract = "{\textcopyright} Pharmacotherapy Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin, Benin City, 300001 Nigeria. Purpose: To determine through a literature review, the current status of patients{\textquoteright} involvement in adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reporting. Methods: Eighteen (18) studies which were published within the period from 2010 to 2016 were reviewed. The studies were extracted from seven databases, viz, Google Scholars, Medline, Academic Search Complete “EBSCO”, Health and Medical Complete ProQuest, Science Direct- Elsevier, SCOPUS and Wiley Online Library. Results: The review revealed that although the reports by patients were of good quality, the patients{\textquoteright} awareness of, and attitude towards, ADR reporting were generally poor. Conclusion: The results of this review suggest the need for patients{\textquoteright} enlightenment on ADRs reporting. Information on how to improve ADRs reporting is provided.",

keywords = "Adverse drug reaction, Patient-centered pharmacovigilance, Patients{\textquoteright} reporting, Systematic review",

author = "Saleh, {Hager Ali} and Annie Fourrier-R{\'e}glat and Eduard Diog{\`e}ne",

year = "2018",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.4314/tjpr.v17i1.24",

language = "English",

volume = "17",

pages = "179--188",

journal = "Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research",

issn = "1596-5996",

publisher = "Pharmacotherapy Group",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient-centered pharmacovigilance: A review

AU - Saleh, Hager Ali

AU - Fourrier-Réglat, Annie

AU - Diogène, Eduard

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - © Pharmacotherapy Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin, Benin City, 300001 Nigeria. Purpose: To determine through a literature review, the current status of patients’ involvement in adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reporting. Methods: Eighteen (18) studies which were published within the period from 2010 to 2016 were reviewed. The studies were extracted from seven databases, viz, Google Scholars, Medline, Academic Search Complete “EBSCO”, Health and Medical Complete ProQuest, Science Direct- Elsevier, SCOPUS and Wiley Online Library. Results: The review revealed that although the reports by patients were of good quality, the patients’ awareness of, and attitude towards, ADR reporting were generally poor. Conclusion: The results of this review suggest the need for patients’ enlightenment on ADRs reporting. Information on how to improve ADRs reporting is provided.

AB - © Pharmacotherapy Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin, Benin City, 300001 Nigeria. Purpose: To determine through a literature review, the current status of patients’ involvement in adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reporting. Methods: Eighteen (18) studies which were published within the period from 2010 to 2016 were reviewed. The studies were extracted from seven databases, viz, Google Scholars, Medline, Academic Search Complete “EBSCO”, Health and Medical Complete ProQuest, Science Direct- Elsevier, SCOPUS and Wiley Online Library. Results: The review revealed that although the reports by patients were of good quality, the patients’ awareness of, and attitude towards, ADR reporting were generally poor. Conclusion: The results of this review suggest the need for patients’ enlightenment on ADRs reporting. Information on how to improve ADRs reporting is provided.

KW - Adverse drug reaction

KW - Patient-centered pharmacovigilance

KW - Patients’ reporting

KW - Systematic review

U2 - 10.4314/tjpr.v17i1.24

DO - 10.4314/tjpr.v17i1.24

M3 - Review article

SN - 1596-5996

VL - 17

SP - 179

EP - 188

JO - Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research

JF - Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research

IS - 1

ER -

Patient-centered pharmacovigilance: A review

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this