TY - JOUR
T1 - Optic chiasm manual and automated measurements in sub-acute optic neuritis with OCT and MRI correlations
AU - Braga, Nathane
AU - Pareto, Deborah
AU - Mongay-Ochoa, Neus
AU - Rodriguez, Breogan
AU - Appriou, Candice
AU - Alberich, Manel
AU - Cabello, Sergio
AU - Vidal-Jordana, Angela
AU - Tintore, Mar
AU - Montalban, Xavier
AU - Rovira, Àlex
AU - Sastre-Garriga, Jaume
N1 - Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - PURPOSE: The optic chiasm (OC) is a central structure in the visual pathway and can be visualized in conventional MRI, but no consensus regarding its measurement has been defined. We aim to investigate the most reproducible manual approach to OC measurement and to explore associations of OC with optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters, and automatic brain segmentation (FreeSurfer) in subacute optic neuritis (sON), multiple sclerosis without optic neuritis (MSwoON), and healthy subjects (HS).MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reproduced two previously reported methodologies and implemented a new proposed simplified approach, entitled optic chiasm mean area (OCMA). The intra and inter-rater reliability and reproducibility were assessed through the intraclass correlation (ICC) and Dice similarity (DSC) coefficients. Partial correlations were calculated to gauge the associations between OCMA fraction (OCMA divided by total intracranial volume), brain regional segmentations derived from FreeSurfer, and OCT parameters.RESULTS: We have analysed 43 sON, 20 MSwoON, and 20 HS. OCMA presented better results for reliability in both intra- and inter-rater analysis (excellent ICC and DSC with over 80% overlap between masks), as compared to the other two approaches. OCMA fraction was associated with OC volume fraction obtained with Freesurfer in all groups, brain parenchymal fraction, and OCT parameters in MSwoON.CONCLUSIONS: The OCMA is a simplified approach to measure OC atrophy, has a higher reliability than the current approaches and shows association with an automated method. OC-derived measures seem to reflect diffuse neurodegenerative damage, whereas, in patients with subacute ON, it may be associated with local damage.
AB - PURPOSE: The optic chiasm (OC) is a central structure in the visual pathway and can be visualized in conventional MRI, but no consensus regarding its measurement has been defined. We aim to investigate the most reproducible manual approach to OC measurement and to explore associations of OC with optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters, and automatic brain segmentation (FreeSurfer) in subacute optic neuritis (sON), multiple sclerosis without optic neuritis (MSwoON), and healthy subjects (HS).MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reproduced two previously reported methodologies and implemented a new proposed simplified approach, entitled optic chiasm mean area (OCMA). The intra and inter-rater reliability and reproducibility were assessed through the intraclass correlation (ICC) and Dice similarity (DSC) coefficients. Partial correlations were calculated to gauge the associations between OCMA fraction (OCMA divided by total intracranial volume), brain regional segmentations derived from FreeSurfer, and OCT parameters.RESULTS: We have analysed 43 sON, 20 MSwoON, and 20 HS. OCMA presented better results for reliability in both intra- and inter-rater analysis (excellent ICC and DSC with over 80% overlap between masks), as compared to the other two approaches. OCMA fraction was associated with OC volume fraction obtained with Freesurfer in all groups, brain parenchymal fraction, and OCT parameters in MSwoON.CONCLUSIONS: The OCMA is a simplified approach to measure OC atrophy, has a higher reliability than the current approaches and shows association with an automated method. OC-derived measures seem to reflect diffuse neurodegenerative damage, whereas, in patients with subacute ON, it may be associated with local damage.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183516656&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/c4f7e89f-2aa7-31a1-b3b5-f114b56c36fc/
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111332
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111332
M3 - Article
C2 - 38290202
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 172
SP - 111332
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
M1 - 111332
ER -