Female inbred Roman high- (RHA-I) and low- (RLA-I) avoidance rats show differences in one-way avoidance learning only when the task implies a highly aversive situation (1. s in the " non-shock" -associated safe compartment, as opposed to 30. s). These between-strain differences seem to depend on strain differences in emotionality, given that: (i) they are abolished by IP administration of the GABAergic anxiolytic diazepam (Torres et al. ) and (ii) avoidance responding appears to correlate with cellular density in the basolateral amygdala (Gómez et al. ). In the present study we further analyzed whether the implication of the amygdala in one-way avoidance depends on the experimental situation aversiveness (30. s vs. 1. s in safety). After bilateral electrolytic lesions (1. mA; 20. s) of the central amygdala (CeA), RHA-I and RLA-I rats were exposed to a danger compartment (where they received a warning signal - 88. dB tone - followed by a 1. mA electric foot-shock), and a safe compartment, where these stimuli were not presented. The number of trials needed to reach 5 consecutive avoidance responses was used as dependent variable. Sham lesioned RLA-I rats showed poorer performance than sham lesioned RHA-I rats only under the 1. s condition. The CeA lesion disrupted the avoidance response only in 1. s groups, abolishing the between-strain performance differences observed under this condition. These results indicate the implication of CeA in one-way avoidance performance, and suggest a reciprocal modulation of fear and reinforcement (i.e. fear relief) in this form of aversive learning. © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
|Publication status||Published - 1 Apr 2010|
- Central amygdala
- Electrolytic lesion
- Roman high- and low-avoidance rats