Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy Versus Open Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An European Association of Urology Guidelines Systematic Review

Benoit Peyronnet, Thomas Seisen, Jose Luis Dominguez-Escrig, Harman Max Bruins, Cathy Yuhong Yuan, Thomas Lam, Steven Maclennan, James N'dow, Marko Babjuk, Eva Comperat, Richard Zigeuner, Richard J. Sylvester, Maximilian Burger, Hugh Mostafid, Bas W.G. van Rhijn, Paolo Gontero, Joan Palou, Sharokh F. Shariat, Morgan Roupret

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

    30 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    © 2017 European Association of Urology The oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy may be poorer than those of open radical nephroureterectomy when bladder cuff is excised laparoscopically, and in patients with locally advanced high-risk (pT3/pT4 and/or high-grade) upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)205-223
    JournalEuropean Urology Focus
    Volume5
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

    Keywords

    • Laparoscopy
    • Recurrence
    • Survival
    • Upper tract
    • Ureter
    • Ureteral neoplasms
    • Urothelial carcinoma

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy Versus Open Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An European Association of Urology Guidelines Systematic Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this