nIFTy cosmology: Comparison of galaxy formation models

Alexander Knebe, Frazer R. Pearce, Peter A. Thomas, Andrew Benson, Jeremy Blaizot, Richard Bower, Jorge Carretero, Francisco J. Castander, Andrea Cattaneo, Sofia A. Cora, Darren J. Croton, Weiguang Cui, Daniel Cunnama, Gabriella De Lucia, Julien E. Devriendt, Pascal J. Elahi, Andreea Font, Fabio Fontanot, Juan Garcia-Bellido, Ignacio D. GargiuloVioleta Gonzalez-Perez, John Helly, Bruno Henriques, Michaela Hirschmann, Jaehyun Lee, Gary A. Mamon, Pierluigi Monaco, Julian Onions, Nelson D. Padilla, Chris Power, Arnau Pujol, Ramin A. Skibba, Rachel S. Somerville, Chaichalit Srisawat, Cristian A. Vega-Martínez, Sukyoung K. Yi

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    43 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    © 2015 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. We present a comparison of 14 galaxy formation models: 12 different semi-analytical models and 2 halo occupation distribution models for galaxy formation based upon the same cosmological simulation and merger tree information derived from it. The participating codes have proven to be very successful in their own right but they have all been calibrated independently using various observational data sets, stellar models, and merger trees. In this paper, we apply them without recalibration and this leads to a wide variety of predictions for the stellar mass function, specific star formation rates, stellar-to-halo mass ratios, and the abundance of orphan galaxies. The scatter is much larger than seen in previous comparison studies primarily because the codes have been used outside of their native environment within which they are well tested and calibrated. The purpose of the 'nIFTy comparison of galaxy formation models' is to bring together as many different galaxy formation modellers as possible and to investigate a common approach to model calibration. This paper provides a unified description for all participating models and presents the initial, uncalibrated comparison as a baseline for our future studies where we will develop a common calibration framework and address the extent to which that reduces the scatter in the model predictions seen here.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)4029-4059
    JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
    Volume451
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

    Keywords

    • Cosmology: theory
    • Dark matter
    • Galaxies: evolution
    • Galaxies: haloes
    • Methods: analytical
    • Methods: numerical

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'nIFTy cosmology: Comparison of galaxy formation models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this