TY - JOUR
T1 - Networks of action situations
T2 - a systematic review of empirical research
AU - Kimmich, Christian
AU - Baldwin, Elizabeth
AU - Kellner, Elke
AU - Oberlack, Christoph
AU - Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/3/11
Y1 - 2022/3/11
N2 - “Action situations”—events, venues, or physically interdependent instances of decision-making—have become a central unit of analysis in the social–environmental sciences, particularly among scholars interested in bridging the social with the biophysical or ecological side of interdependent decisions. A growing body of empirical studies in social–ecological systems research has recently used case and comparative studies to analyse multiple interdependent action situations, structured into networks. In this article, we take stock of this body of empirical research, synthesize the diverse approaches that scholars have taken to assess “networks of action situations”, and identify fruitful paths forward. We conduct a systematic review of the empirical literature in the field, reviewing and summarizing the key characteristics of the empirical studies, including network features, topologies, methods, and data sources used in each case. We summarize and discuss the conceptualizations, methods, diagnostic procedures, and conclusions used in this body of work in a narrative framework synthesis. The review indicates that an increasingly coherent approach is taking shape, but a systematic, protocol-driven, or formalized approach is only partly emerging. We derive future research needs that could help accumulate knowledge from empirical research.
AB - “Action situations”—events, venues, or physically interdependent instances of decision-making—have become a central unit of analysis in the social–environmental sciences, particularly among scholars interested in bridging the social with the biophysical or ecological side of interdependent decisions. A growing body of empirical studies in social–ecological systems research has recently used case and comparative studies to analyse multiple interdependent action situations, structured into networks. In this article, we take stock of this body of empirical research, synthesize the diverse approaches that scholars have taken to assess “networks of action situations”, and identify fruitful paths forward. We conduct a systematic review of the empirical literature in the field, reviewing and summarizing the key characteristics of the empirical studies, including network features, topologies, methods, and data sources used in each case. We summarize and discuss the conceptualizations, methods, diagnostic procedures, and conclusions used in this body of work in a narrative framework synthesis. The review indicates that an increasingly coherent approach is taking shape, but a systematic, protocol-driven, or formalized approach is only partly emerging. We derive future research needs that could help accumulate knowledge from empirical research.
KW - ADJACENT ACTION SITUATIONS
KW - Action situation
KW - COLLECTIVE ACTION
KW - ENERGY
KW - Ecology of games
KW - Environmental governance
KW - FRAMEWORK
KW - GAME-THEORY
KW - INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
KW - IRRIGATION
KW - Institutional analysis
KW - MANAGEMENT
KW - Polycentricity
KW - SUSTAINABILITY
KW - Situation-centred networks
KW - WATER GOVERNANCE
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126021903&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01121-2
DO - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01121-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85126021903
SN - 1862-4065
JO - Sustainability Science
JF - Sustainability Science
ER -