TY - JOUR
T1 - Molecular Detection of Lymph Node Metastases with One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) Pooling in Prostate Cancer :
T2 - The POPCORN Study
AU - Cuadras, Mercè
AU - Semidey Raven, Maria Eugenia
AU - Planas, Jacques
AU - de Torres, Inés M.
AU - Regis, Lucas
AU - Celma, Ana
AU - Trilla Herrera, Enrique
AU - Ramón y Cajal, Santiago
AU - Medina, Rafael A.
AU - Congregado, Belén
AU - Marcilla, David
AU - Japón, Miguel A.
AU - Ramirez, Miguel
AU - Calatrava-Fons, Ana
AU - Leivar, Asier
AU - Alonso, María B.
AU - García, Eugenia
AU - González-Peramato, Pilar
AU - Vazquez-Martul, Dario
AU - Concha-López, Ángel
AU - Chantada, Venancio
AU - Queipo, Francisco J. Hospital Universitario A Coruña
AU - Gago, José L.
AU - Luque, Rafael J.
AU - Moreno-Jimenez, Juan
AU - Catalina-Fernández, Inmaculada
AU - León, Cristina
AU - Morote Robles, Juan
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the most accurate procedure for lymph node (LN) staging in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. LN sectioning and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of at least one slice remains the gold standard for LN evaluation, potentially leading to misdetection of small metastatic focus. Entire LN analysis is possible with One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) by detecting cytokeratin 19 (CK19) mRNA as a surrogate for LN invasion. This study aimed to compare postoperative performance of OSNA pooling with conventional H&E staining for pathological LN detection in PCa patients. POPCORN was an observational, prospective, and multicenter study of patients with PCa who underwent PLND. Dissected LNs were analyzed by both methods. This study included 2503 LNs from 131 patients, showing no statistically significant differences in pathological LN detection. Concordance between methods was high (93.9%), as were specificity (96.6%) and negative predictive value (96.6%) of OSNA pooling. The measure of agreement (Cohen's Kappa [κ]) was 0.70. Only eight (6.1%) discordances were observed, including four misdetections from each method. Results showed a high concordance between OSNA pooling and H&E staining, suggesting that OSNA pooling may be a good alternative to H&E staining to detect LN metastases in PCa patients.
AB - Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is the most accurate procedure for lymph node (LN) staging in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. LN sectioning and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of at least one slice remains the gold standard for LN evaluation, potentially leading to misdetection of small metastatic focus. Entire LN analysis is possible with One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) by detecting cytokeratin 19 (CK19) mRNA as a surrogate for LN invasion. This study aimed to compare postoperative performance of OSNA pooling with conventional H&E staining for pathological LN detection in PCa patients. POPCORN was an observational, prospective, and multicenter study of patients with PCa who underwent PLND. Dissected LNs were analyzed by both methods. This study included 2503 LNs from 131 patients, showing no statistically significant differences in pathological LN detection. Concordance between methods was high (93.9%), as were specificity (96.6%) and negative predictive value (96.6%) of OSNA pooling. The measure of agreement (Cohen's Kappa [κ]) was 0.70. Only eight (6.1%) discordances were observed, including four misdetections from each method. Results showed a high concordance between OSNA pooling and H&E staining, suggesting that OSNA pooling may be a good alternative to H&E staining to detect LN metastases in PCa patients.
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Pelvic lymph node dissection
KW - Lymph node metastases
KW - OSNA
KW - Cytokeratin 19
KW - Pooling
KW - Hematoxylin and eosin staining
U2 - 10.3390/ijms252413489
DO - 10.3390/ijms252413489
M3 - Article
C2 - 39769252
SN - 1422-0067
VL - 25
JO - International Journal of Molecular Sciences
JF - International Journal of Molecular Sciences
ER -