Landscape Agroecology. The dysfunctionalities of industrial agriculture and the loss of the circular bioeconomy in the Barcelona Region, 1956-2009

Claudio Cattaneo, Joan Marull, Enric Tello

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2018 by the authors. The paper analyses how between 1956 and 2009 the agrarian metabolism of the Barcelona Metropolitan Region (BMR) has become less functional, losing circularity in biomass flows and in relationship to its landscape. We do so by adopting a Multi-Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and flow-fund (MuSIASEM) analyses and the nexus with landscape functional structure. The study of agricultural flows of Final Produce, Biomass Reused and External Inputs is integrated with that of land use, livestock, power capacity, and population changes between 1956 (at the beginning of agrarian industrialization) and 2009 (fully industrialized agriculture). A multi-scale analysis is conducted at the landscape scale (seven counties within the Barcelona metropolitan region) as well as for the functions deployed, within an agroecosystem, by the mutual interactions between its funds (landscape, land-uses, livestock, and farming population). A complex nexus between land, livestock, dietary patterns, and energy needs is shown; we conclude that, from the perspective of the circular bioeconomy the agrarian sector has gone worse hand in hand with the landscape functional structure. Therefore, a novel perspective in landscape agroecology is opened.
Original languageEnglish
Article number4722
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Dec 2018

Keywords

  • Barcelona Metropolitan Region
  • Circular bioeconomy
  • Industrial agriculture
  • Landscape agroecology
  • Multi-EROI
  • MuSIASEM

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Landscape Agroecology. The dysfunctionalities of industrial agriculture and the loss of the circular bioeconomy in the Barcelona Region, 1956-2009'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this