TY - JOUR
T1 - Is Local Resection of Anal Canal Tumors Feasible with Transanal Endoscopic Surgery?
AU - Serra-Aracil, Xavier
AU - Campos-Serra, Andrea
AU - Mora-López, Laura
AU - Serra-Pla, Sheila
AU - Pallisera-Lloveras, Anna
AU - Flores-Clotet, Roser
AU - Zárate-Pinedo, Alba
AU - Navarro-Soto, Salvador
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Société Internationale de Chirurgie.
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Background: An important drawback of local surgery for lesions in the anal canal is the difficulty of achieving en bloc full-thickness resections. The aim of this study is to evaluate TEM/TEO in lesions of this type from the point of view of morbidity, mortality and the quality of the pathology specimen. Methods: This is an observational study with prospective data collection from June 2004 to July 2018. Two groups are defined: group A (rectal tumors with proximal margin between 0 and ≤4 cm from anal verge) and group B (distal margin > 4 cm from anal verge). A technical description is provided; resections and postoperative complications in both groups are compared. Results: During the study period, 757 patients underwent TEM/TEO. Finally, 692 patients were included, 192 patients in group A and 500 patients in group B. An en bloc surgical specimen was obtained in 176/192 patients (91.7%), although the defect was completely sutured in 132 (68.8%). In the comparative analysis, group A did not present significantly greater fragmentation of the resected piece [16/192 (8.3%) vs. 36/500 (7.2%), p = 0.630], although group A was associated with greater involvement of the surgical margin [28/192 (14.6%), 32/500 (6.4%), p = 0.001] and clinically relevant morbidity [16/192 (8.3%), 20/500 (4%), p = 0.034]. There was no mortality. Conclusions: The use of TEM/TEO to remove lesions originating in the anal canal is feasible. But we have to take into account that there is an increase in complications, technical difficulties and affected margins resection.
AB - Background: An important drawback of local surgery for lesions in the anal canal is the difficulty of achieving en bloc full-thickness resections. The aim of this study is to evaluate TEM/TEO in lesions of this type from the point of view of morbidity, mortality and the quality of the pathology specimen. Methods: This is an observational study with prospective data collection from June 2004 to July 2018. Two groups are defined: group A (rectal tumors with proximal margin between 0 and ≤4 cm from anal verge) and group B (distal margin > 4 cm from anal verge). A technical description is provided; resections and postoperative complications in both groups are compared. Results: During the study period, 757 patients underwent TEM/TEO. Finally, 692 patients were included, 192 patients in group A and 500 patients in group B. An en bloc surgical specimen was obtained in 176/192 patients (91.7%), although the defect was completely sutured in 132 (68.8%). In the comparative analysis, group A did not present significantly greater fragmentation of the resected piece [16/192 (8.3%) vs. 36/500 (7.2%), p = 0.630], although group A was associated with greater involvement of the surgical margin [28/192 (14.6%), 32/500 (6.4%), p = 0.001] and clinically relevant morbidity [16/192 (8.3%), 20/500 (4%), p = 0.034]. There was no mortality. Conclusions: The use of TEM/TEO to remove lesions originating in the anal canal is feasible. But we have to take into account that there is an increase in complications, technical difficulties and affected margins resection.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074780722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00268-019-05262-x
DO - 10.1007/s00268-019-05262-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 31686162
AN - SCOPUS:85074780722
SN - 0364-2313
VL - 44
SP - 939
EP - 946
JO - World Journal of Surgery
JF - World Journal of Surgery
IS - 3
ER -