TY - JOUR
T1 - International comparisons of COVID-19 pandemic management: What can be learned from activity analysis techniques?
AU - Giménez, Víctor
AU - Prior, Diego
AU - Thieme, Claudio
AU - Emili, Tortosa-Ausina
N1 - Funding Information:
All four authors are grateful to 145 respondents of the survey conducted for the study. We are particularly grateful to two anonymous reviewers, whose comments have contributed to the overall improvement of the paper. Emili Tortosa-Ausina acknowledges financial support by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, PID2020-115450GB-I00 ) and Universitat Jaume I, Spain ( UJI-B2020-27 ). Víctor Giménez and Diego Prior acknowledge financial support from AGAUR , reference 2021SGR00719 . The usual disclaimer applies.
PY - 2023/9/19
Y1 - 2023/9/19
N2 - The global spread of COVID-19 since early 2020 has resulted in significant humanitarian costs. The pandemic has affected most countries to varying degrees, and governments have implemented diverse policies to minimise the impact on public health. However, these policies have varied across regions and even within countries. This study proposes a nonparametric activity analysis methodology to assess how different countries have managed the pandemic. Specifically, we assess the effectiveness of 61 countries nine months into the pandemic using a robust directional Benefit of Doubt (BoD) model according to expert opinion and conditional on country contextual factors. We then estimate the marginal impact of structural and discretionary contextual variables on effectiveness using nonparametric regression analysis, which shows that effectiveness is strongly influenced by socioeconomic and cultural factors. The results reveal three main groups of countries according to their level of effectiveness in pandemic management, suggesting that an accurate assessment of countries’ management of the pandemic benefits greatly from operations research methods, as we obtain benchmarks and find out how these benchmarks (or best practices) vary when contextual factors are included in the analysis.
AB - The global spread of COVID-19 since early 2020 has resulted in significant humanitarian costs. The pandemic has affected most countries to varying degrees, and governments have implemented diverse policies to minimise the impact on public health. However, these policies have varied across regions and even within countries. This study proposes a nonparametric activity analysis methodology to assess how different countries have managed the pandemic. Specifically, we assess the effectiveness of 61 countries nine months into the pandemic using a robust directional Benefit of Doubt (BoD) model according to expert opinion and conditional on country contextual factors. We then estimate the marginal impact of structural and discretionary contextual variables on effectiveness using nonparametric regression analysis, which shows that effectiveness is strongly influenced by socioeconomic and cultural factors. The results reveal three main groups of countries according to their level of effectiveness in pandemic management, suggesting that an accurate assessment of countries’ management of the pandemic benefits greatly from operations research methods, as we obtain benchmarks and find out how these benchmarks (or best practices) vary when contextual factors are included in the analysis.
KW - Data envelopment analysis
KW - COVID-19
KW - Composite indicators
KW - Assurance region
KW - Robust conditional convex frontier models
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/a533f24d-8ce6-352c-bb63-a51ab12715ae/
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85172411941&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.omega.2023.102966
DO - 10.1016/j.omega.2023.102966
M3 - Article
SN - 0305-0483
VL - 122
SP - 1
EP - 39
JO - Omega, The International Journal of Management Science
JF - Omega, The International Journal of Management Science
M1 - 102966
ER -