Indirect majority and minority influence: An exploratory study

Veronika Brandstätter, Naomi Ellemers, Elena Gaviria, Francesca Giosue, Pascal Huguet, Marceline Kroon, Pascal Morchain, Margot Pujal, Monica Rubini, Gabriel Mugny, Juan A. Perez

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    22 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In a 2 × 2 design, 85 subjects were asked to estimate the size of angles (direct influence) that were either 90 or 85°, after being confronted with incorrect judgements of a majority (88 per cent) or a minority (12 per cent) of people estimating the angles at 50°. Additionally, pre‐ and post‐test measures were used to establish indirect influence on subjects' judgements pertaining to acute angles (i.e. on the estimation of the length of lines constituting the angles, and on the imaginary weight of figures represented by these angles). Overall, little direct influence is observed. This may partly be due to the introduction of a denial of the credibility of the source in all conditions. In fact, some evidence of direct influence is only found in the majority–85° angles condition. An instance of indirect influence (on the estimation of length of lines) appeared as the result of a majority stance when the angles in the experimental phase were 90°. When these angles were 85°, indirect minority influence (on the estimation of weight of figures) was observed. These effects had been predicted on the basis of the hypothesis stating that indirect majority influence would be possible when subjects expected consensus on the correct response (in the 90° angles condition), without being able to reach consensus at the manifest level (because of the denial and the restriction imposed by the clear shape of 90° angles). Indirect minority influence was hypothesized to be stronger in a situation that allows for diverse responses (i.e. for 85° angles). Copyright © 1991 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)199-211
    JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
    Volume21
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1991

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Indirect majority and minority influence: An exploratory study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this