Impairment of two-way active avoidance after pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus lesions: Effects of conditioned stimulus duration

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It was investigated whether the disruptive effects of bilateral lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus on two-way active avoidance might vary depending on variations of task demand. The animals were either subjected to bilateral electrolytic lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (Lesion groups) or were sham-operated (Control groups). All the rats were subjected to two 30-trial sessions of two-way active avoidance (separated by ten days), using either a 10-s conditioned stimulus (low task demand) or a 3-s conditioned stimulus (high task demand). The lesions induced a significant disruption of two-way active avoidance in the two conditions tested, but, in both lesioned and control rats, the number of avoidance responses was higher when the 10-s conditioned stimulus was used. In lesioned animals, the condition of high task demand was associated with a significant increase of escape failures. Lesions did not affect locomotor activity during the period of adaptation to the conditioning apparatus, but induced training-specific motor deficits (a decrease of intertrial crossings and an enhancement of escape latencies) regardless of the specific training conditions used. The results are discussed in terms of the influences of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in thalamocortical and striatal systems. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-9
JournalBehavioural Brain Research
Volume118
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jan 2001

Keywords

  • CH5
  • Cortical arousal
  • Learning and memory
  • Pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus
  • Rat
  • Two-way active avoidance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impairment of two-way active avoidance after pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus lesions: Effects of conditioned stimulus duration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this