Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

How to periodize a violent conflict: A proposal using the case of Mexico

Gustavo Fondevila, Ricardo Massa*, Carlos Vilalta

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The definition of what constitutes a conflict, in terms of both time and events, has been consistently debated in the historical study of social phenomena. What has become increasingly clear, however, is that the methods used to define it are generally biased as they are highly dependent on the perceptions of the researchers who establish them. Using Mexico as a case study, we tested a data-driven method for periodizing long-term homicide trends. We found structural break analysis and Markov-switching regression modelling to be useful methods for periodizing long-term time series data of homicide rates, without an a priori or skewed definition. We also found that the current trend of increasing homicidal violence may prove difficult to reverse given that historical structural shifts in Mexican homicidal violence are unlikely events in the long term.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-125
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jan 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Conflict periodization
  • homicide rate
  • Markov-switching
  • structural break analysis
  • time series

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How to periodize a violent conflict: A proposal using the case of Mexico'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this