Abstract
The definition of what constitutes a conflict, in terms of both time and events, has been consistently debated in the historical study of social phenomena. What has become increasingly clear, however, is that the methods used to define it are generally biased as they are highly dependent on the perceptions of the researchers who establish them. Using Mexico as a case study, we tested a data-driven method for periodizing long-term homicide trends. We found structural break analysis and Markov-switching regression modelling to be useful methods for periodizing long-term time series data of homicide rates, without an a priori or skewed definition. We also found that the current trend of increasing homicidal violence may prove difficult to reverse given that historical structural shifts in Mexican homicidal violence are unlikely events in the long term.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 111-125 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | International Journal of Social Research Methodology |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 16 Jan 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Conflict periodization
- homicide rate
- Markov-switching
- structural break analysis
- time series
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How to periodize a violent conflict: A proposal using the case of Mexico'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver