TY - JOUR
T1 - How to handle concomitant asymptomatic prosthetic joints during an episode of hematogenous PJI, a multicentre analysis.
AU - Wouthuyzen-Bakker, Marjan
AU - Sebillotte, Marine
AU - Arvieux, Cédric
AU - Fernandez-Sampedro, Marta
AU - Senneville, Eric
AU - Barbero, José Maria
AU - Lora-Tamayo, Jaime
AU - Aboltins, Craig
AU - Trebse, Rihard
AU - Salles, Mauro José
AU - Kramer, Tobias Siegfried
AU - Ferrari, Matteo
AU - Garcia-Cañete, Joaquín
AU - Benito, Natividad
AU - Diaz-Brito, Vicens
AU - Del Toro, Maria Dolores
AU - Scarborough, Matthew
AU - Soriano, Alex
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - INTRODUCTION Prosthetic joints are at risk of becoming infected during an episode of bacteremia, especially during S. aureus bacteremia. However, it is unclear how often asymptomatic PJI occurs and whether additional diagnostics should be considered. METHODS In this multicenter study, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients with a late acute (hematogenous) PJI between 2005-2015 who had concomitant prosthetic joints in situ. Patients without at least 1 year of follow -up were excluded. RESULTS 91 patients with a hematogenous PJI and 108 concomitant prosthetic joints were included. The incident PJI was most frequently caused by Staphylococcus aureus (43%), followed by streptococci (26%) and Gram negative rods (18%). Of 108 concomitant prosthetic joints, 13 were symptomatic, of which 10 were subsequently diagnosed as a second PJI. Of the 95 asymptomatic prosthetic joints, 1 PJI developed during the follow-up period and was classified as a 'missed' PJI at the time of bacteremia with S. aureus (1.1%). Infected prosthetic joints were younger than the non-infected ones in 67% of cases, and prosthetic knees were affected more often than prosthetic hips (78%). CONCLUSION During an episode of hematogenous PJI, concomitant asymptomatic prosthetic joints have a very low risk of being infected, and additional diagnostic work-up for these joints is not necessary.
AB - INTRODUCTION Prosthetic joints are at risk of becoming infected during an episode of bacteremia, especially during S. aureus bacteremia. However, it is unclear how often asymptomatic PJI occurs and whether additional diagnostics should be considered. METHODS In this multicenter study, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients with a late acute (hematogenous) PJI between 2005-2015 who had concomitant prosthetic joints in situ. Patients without at least 1 year of follow -up were excluded. RESULTS 91 patients with a hematogenous PJI and 108 concomitant prosthetic joints were included. The incident PJI was most frequently caused by Staphylococcus aureus (43%), followed by streptococci (26%) and Gram negative rods (18%). Of 108 concomitant prosthetic joints, 13 were symptomatic, of which 10 were subsequently diagnosed as a second PJI. Of the 95 asymptomatic prosthetic joints, 1 PJI developed during the follow-up period and was classified as a 'missed' PJI at the time of bacteremia with S. aureus (1.1%). Infected prosthetic joints were younger than the non-infected ones in 67% of cases, and prosthetic knees were affected more often than prosthetic hips (78%). CONCLUSION During an episode of hematogenous PJI, concomitant asymptomatic prosthetic joints have a very low risk of being infected, and additional diagnostic work-up for these joints is not necessary.
KW - Asymptomatic
KW - Bacteremia
KW - Cohort
KW - Concomitant
KW - Gram-negative rods
KW - Medicine
KW - Multicenter study
KW - Staphylococcus aureus
KW - Surgery
KW - Very low risk
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/689b2db0-6df8-3ac0-98a4-310c275a15f1/
U2 - 10.1093/cid/ciaa1222
DO - 10.1093/cid/ciaa1222
M3 - Artículo
C2 - 32813012
SN - 1058-4838
JO - Clinical Infectious Diseases
JF - Clinical Infectious Diseases
ER -