How different aid flows affect different trade flows: Evidence from Africa and its largest donors

Ivan Savin*, Marta Marson, Marina Sutormina

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study we compare the impacts of official finance coming from the largest donors of African countries on bilateral trade flows between the donor and the recipient. Applying a gravity model approach, we distinguish between development finance and other official flows. We find that official finance from all the donors stimulates export of goods to Africa, while trade flows in the opposite direction are fostered in the case of China and Europe, but not for the US. Despite some claims in the literature that aid from China aims at securing import of natural resources, we find evidence that countries receiving Chinese aid raise their bilateral export of manufactured goods and not of primary commodities. Finally, while for Europe and the US official flows other than development assistance play a bigger role in shaping trade flows, China primarily uses highly concessional and development oriented flows.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-136
Number of pages18
JournalStructural Change and Economic Dynamics
Volume55
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

Keywords

  • Aid-trade relation
  • China
  • Gravity model
  • Official development assistance
  • Other official flows

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How different aid flows affect different trade flows: Evidence from Africa and its largest donors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this