TY - JOUR
T1 - Heterogeneity in Response to MCT and Psychoeducation :
T2 - A Feasibility Study Using Latent Class Mixed Models in First-Episode Psychosis
AU - Ferrer-Quintero, Marta
AU - Fernández, Daniel
AU - López-Carrilero, Raquel
AU - Díaz-Cutraro, L
AU - Verdaguer-Rodríguez, Marina
AU - García-Mieres, Helena
AU - Huerta-Ramos, Elena
AU - Gómez-Benito, Juana
AU - Peláez, Trini
AU - Birulés, Irene
AU - Barajas Vélez, Ana
AU - Pousa, Esther
AU - Barrigón, María Luisa
AU - Gutiérrez-Zotes, Alfonso
AU - Grasa, Eva
AU - Ruiz-Delgado, Isabel
AU - Lorente-Rovira, Esther
AU - Cid Colom, Jordi
AU - Ochoa, Susana
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Metacognitive training (MCT) is an effective treatment for psychosis. Longitudinal trajectories of treatment response are unknown but could point to strategies to maximize treatment efficacy during the first episodes. This work aims to explore the possible benefit of using latent class mixed models (LCMMs) to understand how treatment response differs between metacognitive training and psychoeducation. We conducted LCMMs in 28 patients that received MCT and 34 patients that received psychoeducation. We found that MCT is effective in improving cognitive insight in all patients but that these effects wane at follow-up. In contrast, psychoeducation does not improve cognitive insight, and may increase self-certainty in a group of patients. These results suggest that LCMMs are valuable tools that can aid in treatment prescription and in predicting response to specific treatments.
AB - Metacognitive training (MCT) is an effective treatment for psychosis. Longitudinal trajectories of treatment response are unknown but could point to strategies to maximize treatment efficacy during the first episodes. This work aims to explore the possible benefit of using latent class mixed models (LCMMs) to understand how treatment response differs between metacognitive training and psychoeducation. We conducted LCMMs in 28 patients that received MCT and 34 patients that received psychoeducation. We found that MCT is effective in improving cognitive insight in all patients but that these effects wane at follow-up. In contrast, psychoeducation does not improve cognitive insight, and may increase self-certainty in a group of patients. These results suggest that LCMMs are valuable tools that can aid in treatment prescription and in predicting response to specific treatments.
KW - First-episode psychosis
KW - Social cognition
KW - Metacognition
KW - Latent class mixed models
KW - Metacognitive training
KW - Psychoeducation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85141748571
U2 - 10.3390/healthcare10112155
DO - 10.3390/healthcare10112155
M3 - Article
C2 - 36360496
SN - 2227-9032
VL - 10
JO - Healthcare
JF - Healthcare
ER -