Governance mechanisms, social performance disclosure and performance in microfinance: Does legal status matter?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2015 CIRIEC. In this paper we examine diverse governance mechanisms implemented by microfinance institutions, as well as their relationships with both social and financial performance, using a database obtained from the MIX, consisting of MFIs reporting data both on financial and social performance. We find that some governance mechanisms are significantly different among MFIs depending on their legal status. MFIs with NGO status have more diversity in their boards, adhere more to fair practices related to their human resources, and pay more attention to training in social performance management. Furthermore, we find that NGOs perform better at a social level (serve more clients; reach more poor clients; a large fraction of their borrowers are women). We find that external governance mechanisms have little or no effect, while board characteristics consistently and significantly affect social performance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-155
JournalAnnals of Public and Cooperative Economics
Volume86
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Governance mechanisms, social performance disclosure and performance in microfinance: Does legal status matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this