First successful double-factor PGD for Lynch syndrome: Monogenic analysis and comprehensive aneuploidy screening

G. Daina, L. Ramos, A. Obradors, M. Rius, O. Martinez-Pasarell, A. Polo, J. del Rey, J. Obradors, J. Benet, J. Navarro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been applied worldwide for a great variety of single-gene disorders over the last 20years. The aim of this work was to perform a double-factor preimplantation genetic diagnosis (DF-PGD) protocol in a family at risk for Lynch syndrome. The family underwent a DF-PGD approach in which two blastomeres from each cleavage-stage embryo were biopsied and used for monogenic and comprehensive cytogenetic analysis, respectively. Fourteen embryos were biopsied for the monogenic disease and after multiple displacement amplification (MDA), 12 embryos were diagnosed; 5 being non-affected and 7 affected by the disease. Thirteen were biopsied to perform the aneuploidy screening by short-comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). The improved DF-PGD approach permitted the selection of not only healthy but also euploid embryos for transfer. This has been the first time a double analysis of embryos has been performed in a family affected by Lynch syndrome, resulting in the birth of two healthy children. The protocol described in this work offers a reliable alternative for single-gene disorder assessment together with a comprehensive aneuploidy screening of the embryos that may increase the chances of pregnancy and birth of transferred embryos. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-73
JournalClinical Genetics
Volume84
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2013

Keywords

  • Aneuploidy
  • Comparative genomic hybridization
  • Lynch syndrome
  • Monogenic disease
  • Preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'First successful double-factor PGD for Lynch syndrome: Monogenic analysis and comprehensive aneuploidy screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this