Expansion versus density in Barcelona: A valuation exercise

Dolores Garcia, Pere Riera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

51 Citations (Scopus)


This study provides an alternative empirical approach to identify optimal urban growth when accounting for its associated environmental effects. It is assumed that preserving outer landscapes and enjoying reduced density levels are inversely related, and so households must trade them off. The exercise analyses whether more disperse urban growth would be socially desirable in a particular area, the metropolitan region of Barcelona. A contingent valuation exercise using a double-bounded format was undertaken and an extended version of the spike model was used to estimate the willingness to pay of changing to a less dense urban path. The results show that a less compact scenario would be welfare-increasing in aggregate terms. It is suggested that general proposals on compacting cities should not necessarily constitute a desirable planning goal.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1925-1936
JournalUrban Studies
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2003


Dive into the research topics of 'Expansion versus density in Barcelona: A valuation exercise'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this