Evolution of locomotion in anthropoidea: The semicircular canal evidence

Timothy M. Ryan, Mary T. Silcox, Alan Walker, Xianyun Mao, David R. Begun, Brenda R. Benefit, Philip D. Gingerich, Meike Koöhler, László Kordos, Monte L. McCrossin, Salvador Moyà-Solà, William J. Sanders, Erik R. Seiffert, Elwyn Simons, Iyad S. Zalmout, Fred Spoor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)


Our understanding of locomotor evolution in anthropoid primates has been limited to those taxa for which good postcranial fossil material and appropriate modern analogues are available. We report the results of an analysis of semicircular canal size variation in 16 fossil anthropoid species dating from the Late Eocene to the Late Miocene, and use these data to reconstruct evolutionary changes in locomotor adaptations in anthropoid primates over the last 35 Ma. Phylogenetically informed regression analyses of semicircular canal size reveal three important aspects of anthropoid locomotor evolution: (i) the earliest anthropoid primates engaged in relatively slow locomotor behaviours, suggesting that this was the basal anthropoid pattern; (ii) platyrrhines from the Miocene of South America were relatively agile compared with earlier anthropoids; and (iii) while the last common ancestor of cercopithecoids and hominoids likely was relatively slow like earlier stem catarrhines, the results suggest that the basal crown catarrhine may have been a relatively agile animal. The latter scenario would indicate that hominoids of the later Miocene secondarily derived their relatively slow locomotor repertoires. © 2012 The Royal Society.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3467-3475
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Issue number1742
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012


  • Generalized least-squares analysis
  • Primates
  • Vestibular system


Dive into the research topics of 'Evolution of locomotion in anthropoidea: The semicircular canal evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this