Abstract
Objectives: To compare the performance of the BacT/ALERT PZA kit (BioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) with the radiometric BACTEC 460TB PZA test (Becton-Dickinson method) for testing Mycobacterium tuberculosis susceptibility to pyrazinamide. Methods: A total of 50 M. tuberculosis strains were tested. Thirty of these strains had been previously considered pyrazinamide-susceptible and 20 pyrazinamide-resistant by BACTEC 460TB. Results: Final overall agreement was 100%. Time needed for the susceptibility test was 6.69 days for the BacT/ALERT PZA kit versus 8.07 days for the BACTEC 460TB PZA test. Conclusions: BacT/ALERT PZA test isan excellent alternative to BACTEC 460TB for pyrazinamide susceptibility testing. © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 655-657 |
| Journal | Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2007 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Resistance
- Susceptibility testing
- Tuberculosis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of the BacT/ALERT PZA kit in comparison with the BACTEC 460TB PZA for testing Mycobacterium tuberculosis susceptibility to pyrazinamide'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver