Evaluation of [ - 2] proPSA and prostate health index (phi) for the detection of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Xavier Filella, Nuria Giménez

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

115 Citations (Scopus)


The usefulness of %[-2] proPSA and Prostate Health Index (phi) in the detection of prostate cancer are currently unknown. It has been suggested that these tests can distinguish prostate cancer from benign prostatic diseases better than PSA or %fPSA. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available scientific evidence to evaluate the clinical usefulness of %[-2] proPSA and phi. Relevant published papers were identified by searching computerized bibliographic systems. Data on sensitivity and specificity were extracted from 12 studies: 10 studies about %[-2] proPSA (3928 patients in total, including 1762 with confirmed prostate cancer) and eight studies about phi (2919 patients in total, including 1515 with confirmed prostate cancer). The sensitivity for the detection of prostate cancer was 90% for %[-2] proPSA and phi, while the pooled specificity was 32.5% (95% CI 30.6 - 34.5) and 31.6% (95% CI 29.2 - 34.0)or %[-2] proPSA and phi, respectively. The measurement of %[-2] proPSA improves the accuracy of prostate cancer detection in comparison with PSA or %fPSA, particularly in the group of patients with PSA between 2 μg/L and 10 μg/L. Similar results were obtained measuring phi. Using these tests, it is possible to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies, maintaining a high cancer detection rate. Published results also showed that %[-2] proPSA and phi are related to the aggressiveness of the tumor.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)729-739
JournalClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2013


  • Evidence-based laboratory medicine
  • Metaanalysis
  • ProPSA
  • Prostate cancer
  • Prostate Health Index (phi)
  • Prostate specific antigen (PSA)
  • Systematic review


Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of [ - 2] proPSA and prostate health index (phi) for the detection of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this