Evaluating hunting and capture methods for urban wild boar population management

María Escobar-González, Josep Maria Maria López-Martín, Gregorio Mentaberre García, Marta Valldeperes, Josep Estruch Morente, Stefania Tampach, Joan Roldán, Santiago Lavín González, Emmanuel Serrano Ferron, Jorge R López Olvera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Wild ungulates are expanding in range and number worldwide leading to an urgent need to manage their populations to minimize conflicts and promote coexistence with humans. In the metropolitan area of Barcelona (MAB), wild boar is the main wildlife species causing a nuisance, from traffic accidents to health risks. Selective harvesting of specific sex and age classes and reducing anthropogenic food resources would be the most efficient approach to dealing with overpopulation. Nonetheless, there is a gap in knowledge regarding the age and sex selectivity of the capture methods currently applied in the MAB for wild boar population control. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the performance and age and sex bias of different hunting and capture methods and the seasonal patterns in their performance (number of captured individuals per event). From February 2014 to August 2022, 1454 wild boars were captured in the MAB using drop net, teleanaesthesia, cage traps, night stalks, and drive hunting. We applied generalized linear models (GLM) to compare the performance of these methods for the total number of wild boars, the wild boars belonging to each age category (i.e., adult, yearling, and juvenile), and for each season. The studied capture methods showed age-class bias and sex bias in adults (>2 years). Drive hunting and drop net removed mainly adult females and yearlings (1–2 years), with drive hunting having the highest performance for adult males. Instead, cage traps and drop net were the best methods to capture juveniles (<1 year). Overall, global performance was higher in summer, decreasingly followed by autumn and spring, winter being the worst performing season. Wildlife managers and researchers should consider the different performance and sex and age bias of each hunting and capture method, as well as the associated public cost, to improve efficiency and achieve the best results in wild boar population management.

Original languageEnglish
Article number173463
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume940
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Aug 2024

Keywords

  • Animal hunting and capture
  • Age and sex bias
  • Performance
  • Sus scrofa
  • Urban wildlife
  • Wildlife management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating hunting and capture methods for urban wild boar population management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this