European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA): Contact allergies in relation to body sites in patients with allergic contact dermatitis

Jart A.F. Oosterhaven, Wolfgang Uter, Werner Aberer, José C. Armario-Hita, Barbara K. Ballmer-Weber, Andrea Bauer, Magdalena Czarnecka-Operacz, Peter Elsner, Juan García-Gavín, Ana M. Giménez-Arnau, Swen M. John, Beata Kręcisz, Vera Mahler, Thomas Rustemeyer, Anna Sadowska-Przytocka, Javier Sánchez-Pérez, Dagmar Simon, Skaidra Valiukevičienė, Elke Weisshaar, Marie L.A. SchuttelaarUlrike Beiteke, Peter Frosch, Jochen Brasch, Thomas Fuchs, Anna Balato, Fabio Ayala, Marta Kieć-Świerczyńska, Virginia Fernández-Redondo, Pedro Mercader, Inmaculada Ruiz, Juan F. Silvestre, Andreas Bircher, Jürgen Grabbe

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    © 2018 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Background: Analyses of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) database have focused primarily on the prevalence of contact allergies to the European baseline series, both overall and in subgroups of patients. However, affected body sites have hitherto not been addressed. Objective: To determine the prevalence of contact allergies for distinct body sites in patients with allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Methods: Analysis of data collected by the ESSCA (www.essca-dc.org) in consecutively patch tested patients, from 2009 to 2014, in eight European countries was performed. Cases were selected on the basis of the presence of minimally one positive patch test reaction to the baseline series, and a final diagnosis of ACD attributed to only one body site. Results: Six thousand two hundred and fifty-five cases were analysed. The head and hand were the most common single sites that ACD was attributed to. Differences between countries were seen for several body sites. Nickel, fragrance mix I, cobalt and methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone were the most frequent allergens reported for various body sites. Conclusions: Distinct allergen patterns per body site were observed. However, contact allergies were probably not always relevant for the dermatitis that patients presented with. The possibility of linking positive patch test reactions to relevance, along with affected body sites, should be a useful addition to patch test documentation systems.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)263-272
    JournalContact Dermatitis
    Volume80
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019

    Keywords

    • allergic contact dermatitis
    • body site
    • contact allergy
    • patch test
    • sensitization

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA): Contact allergies in relation to body sites in patients with allergic contact dermatitis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this