Abstract
As an alternative to the environmental cartel approach, we assume that an international environmental agreement aims simply at providing a collective response to a perceived threat. Given this less demanding concept of cooperation and considering that most treaties become enforceable only after ratification by a sufficient number of participants, we examine the set of self-enforceable agreements. This set contains first-best but also second-best agreements that do not maximize the collective welfare of members but meet environmental and/or participative requirements. We study the properties of this set and discuss admissible values of targets and thresholds that favour economics over environmental objectives and vice versa. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 565-584 |
| Journal | Public Choice |
| Volume | 151 |
| Issue number | 3-4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2012 |
Keywords
- Abatement bound
- International environmental agreement
- Ratification threshold
- Self-enforcement
- Social welfare
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental cooperation: Ratifying second-best agreements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver