Embodied pollution in trade: Estimating the 'environmental load displacement' of industrialised countries

Roldan Muradian, Martin O'Connor, Joan Martinez-Alier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

172 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present paper sets out to aid in the development of 'environmental load displacement' indicators. Developing the notion of the 'environmental memory' of physical flows, we estimated embodied pollution in trade of 18 industrialized countries with (a) the rest of the world and (b) developing countries, from 1976 to 1994. We found that in the last years of analysis, total imports of Japan, USA and Western Europe have entailed, in general, larger air pollutant emissions than local exports. The balance of embodied emissions in trade (BEET) seems to follow an inverted-U shape across time in Japan and Western Europe, and an N-shape in the US. In the period of analysis, Japanese and European environmental terms of trade with developing countries 'improved' (from the Japanese and European point of view), whereas American environmental terms of trade with developing countries 'deteriorated' over time. Although there is no statistical trend between income and embodied emissions in imports in a cross-section analysis, there does seem to be a positive relationship between both variables at a national level. The results suggest that, despite many shortcomings, this type of assessment may shed useful insights on the international aspects of sustainable development. © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-67
JournalEcological Economics
Volume41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2002

Keywords

  • Ecologically unequal exchange
  • Embodied pollution
  • Environmental Kuznets curve
  • Environmental terms of trade
  • International trade

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Embodied pollution in trade: Estimating the 'environmental load displacement' of industrialised countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this