TY - JOUR
T1 - Octava evaluación de test editados en España: Una experiencia participativa
AU - Viladrich, Carme
AU - Doval Dieguez, Eduardo
AU - Penelo Werner, Eva
AU - Aliaga, J.
AU - Espelt, Albert
AU - Garcia Rueda, Rebeca Pilar
AU - Angulo Brunet, Ariadna
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Dr. Laura G?mez and Prof. Dr. Jos? Mu?iz for their support throughout the process. To the test publishers for the contribution of six copies of each test, to the Faculty of Psychology and to the Humanities Library of the UAB for the purchase of the missing copies to complete the necessary material to cover all the class groups. To the Espai de Suport i Innovaci? Docent of the Faculty of Psychology of the UAB for their support in arranging access to the materials. To Remei Prat, Elena Ripoll?s, Salom? T?rrega, and Joan Pons for their contribution to the development of the project as part of the teaching team in previous courses.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Colegio Oficial de Psicologos. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Every year, the Test Commission of the Spanish Psychological Association promotes the assessment of the test quality of several published tests. The aim of the present study is two-fold: a) to present results for the eighth review, and b) to consider the contribution of the universities in this process. Ten experts, 332 students, and seven professors participated in this edition and the standard protocol for review was aligned towards a service-learning format. For the 11 tests assessed, results showed an adequate quality (average of 3.9 points on a 1-5 rating scale) similar to previous years (r =.90). The strengths were test development and standardization, and there were a number of proposals for improving other sections suggested. The service-learning approach contributed to the diversification of voices in the process, with students’ and experts’ reports showing similar quality and an expected level of agreement (r =.67). We conclude that this project has helped to identify the opportunity to further expand the use of shared language in order to strengthen the communication between the test publishers, the promoters of the Spanish model of test assessment, and the test users, especially in the case of beginners.
AB - Every year, the Test Commission of the Spanish Psychological Association promotes the assessment of the test quality of several published tests. The aim of the present study is two-fold: a) to present results for the eighth review, and b) to consider the contribution of the universities in this process. Ten experts, 332 students, and seven professors participated in this edition and the standard protocol for review was aligned towards a service-learning format. For the 11 tests assessed, results showed an adequate quality (average of 3.9 points on a 1-5 rating scale) similar to previous years (r =.90). The strengths were test development and standardization, and there were a number of proposals for improving other sections suggested. The service-learning approach contributed to the diversification of voices in the process, with students’ and experts’ reports showing similar quality and an expected level of agreement (r =.67). We conclude that this project has helped to identify the opportunity to further expand the use of shared language in order to strengthen the communication between the test publishers, the promoters of the Spanish model of test assessment, and the test users, especially in the case of beginners.
KW - Psychometrics
KW - Service-learning
KW - Test quality
KW - Test review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102024686&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2020.2937
DO - https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2020.2937
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85102024686
VL - 42
SP - 1
EP - 9
JO - Papeles del Psicologo
JF - Papeles del Psicologo
SN - 0214-7823
IS - 1
ER -