TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of the Epley manoeuvre in posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: A randomised clinical trial in primary care
AU - Moreno, José Luis Ballvé
AU - Matos, Yolanda Rando
AU - Perez, Estrella Rodero
AU - Curto, Xavier Monteverde
AU - Ripollès, Carles Rubio
AU - Farres, Noemí Moreno
AU - Agudelo, Olga Lucia Arias
AU - Muñoz, Ricard Carrillo
AU - Balboa, Iván Villar
AU - Puértolas, Oriol Cunillera
AU - Ortega, Jesús Almeda
AU - Cantera, Carlos Martin
AU - Ledesma, Rafael Azagra
N1 - © British Journal of General Practice 2019.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - © British Journal of General Practice Background Evidence on the effectiveness of the Epley manoeuvre in primary care is scarce. Aim To evaluate effectiveness at 1 week, 1 month, and 1 year of a single Epley manoeuvre versus a sham manoeuvre in primary care. Design and setting Multicentre, double-blind randomised controlled trial in two primary care practices in Spain from November 2012 to January 2015. Method Patients were ≥18 years diagnosed with subjective or objective posterior benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (vertigo only, or vertigo and nystagmus after a Dix-Hallpike test [DHT]). The intervention group received the Epley manoeuvre, and the control group received a sham manoeuvre. Betahistine was prescribed following the same regimen in both groups. The main outcome measures were the DHT result classified as negative (neither vertigo nor nystagmus) or positive. Positive results were further divided into a positive result for both vertigo and nystagmus (positive DHT with nystagmus), and a positive result for vertigo only (positive DHT without nystagmus); self-reported resolution of vertigo; and self-reported severity of vertigo evaluated on a 10-point Likert scale (10 = worst imaginable vertigo). Results In total, 134 patients were randomised to either the intervention group (n = 66) or the sham group (n = 68). The intervention group showed better results in the unadjusted analyses at 1 week, with a lower rate of positive DHT with nystagmus (P = 0.022). A positive baseline DHT with nystagmus was associated with a reduction in vertigo severity (marginal effect for 10-point Likert-like question -1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.95 to -0.51) and better positive DHT rates in the intervention group (adjusted odds ratio 0.09, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.92) in the multivariate analyses. Conclusion A single Epley manoeuvre performed in primary care is an effective treatment for reversing a positive DHT and reducing vertigo severity in patients with baseline nystagmus in the DHT.
AB - © British Journal of General Practice Background Evidence on the effectiveness of the Epley manoeuvre in primary care is scarce. Aim To evaluate effectiveness at 1 week, 1 month, and 1 year of a single Epley manoeuvre versus a sham manoeuvre in primary care. Design and setting Multicentre, double-blind randomised controlled trial in two primary care practices in Spain from November 2012 to January 2015. Method Patients were ≥18 years diagnosed with subjective or objective posterior benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (vertigo only, or vertigo and nystagmus after a Dix-Hallpike test [DHT]). The intervention group received the Epley manoeuvre, and the control group received a sham manoeuvre. Betahistine was prescribed following the same regimen in both groups. The main outcome measures were the DHT result classified as negative (neither vertigo nor nystagmus) or positive. Positive results were further divided into a positive result for both vertigo and nystagmus (positive DHT with nystagmus), and a positive result for vertigo only (positive DHT without nystagmus); self-reported resolution of vertigo; and self-reported severity of vertigo evaluated on a 10-point Likert scale (10 = worst imaginable vertigo). Results In total, 134 patients were randomised to either the intervention group (n = 66) or the sham group (n = 68). The intervention group showed better results in the unadjusted analyses at 1 week, with a lower rate of positive DHT with nystagmus (P = 0.022). A positive baseline DHT with nystagmus was associated with a reduction in vertigo severity (marginal effect for 10-point Likert-like question -1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.95 to -0.51) and better positive DHT rates in the intervention group (adjusted odds ratio 0.09, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.92) in the multivariate analyses. Conclusion A single Epley manoeuvre performed in primary care is an effective treatment for reversing a positive DHT and reducing vertigo severity in patients with baseline nystagmus in the DHT.
KW - Adult
KW - Aged
KW - Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo/therapy
KW - Double-Blind Method
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Patient Positioning/methods
KW - Primary Health Care
KW - Treatment Outcome
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/effectiveness-epley-manoeuvre-posterior-canal-benign-paroxysmal-positional-vertigo-randomised-clinic
U2 - 10.3399/bjgp18X700253
DO - 10.3399/bjgp18X700253
M3 - Article
C2 - 30510098
SN - 0960-1643
VL - 69
SP - E52-E60
JO - British Journal of General Practice
JF - British Journal of General Practice
IS - 678
ER -