Abstract
Many well-intended climate-energy strategies are ineffective in the absence of serious environmental regulation. This holds, among others, for direct support of clean energy, voluntary energy conservation, technical standards on a limited set of products, unilateral stringent carbon pricing, and awaiting peak oil as a climate strategy. All of these suffer from "escape routes" that indirectly increase CO 2 emissions and thus make the original strategy ineffective. On the other hand, environmental regulation alone may lead to a myopia-bias, stimulating early dominance of cost-effective technologies and a focus on incremental innovations associated with such technologies rather than on radical innovations. Although adopting a partial viewpoint keeps the analysis simple, we urgently need a more inclusive systems perspective on climate solutions. This will allow the formulation of an effective climate policy package that addresses the various escape routes. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 530-536 |
Journal | Energy Policy |
Volume | 46 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2012 |
Keywords
- Carbon leakage
- CO rebound 2
- Green paradox