Dominance and Dialogue in Couple Therapy for Psychological Intimate Partner Violence

Berta Vall, Jaakko Seikkula, Aarno Laitila, Juha Holma

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)


    © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York. Although there is controversy concerning indications for conjoint therapy in Intimate Partner Violence (IPV), both research and practice have come to recognize that it has some important benefits. This study analyzes issues of dominance and dialogue in a conjoint therapy for psychological IPV within a naturalistic setting, in which the spouses sought couple therapy on a voluntary basis. The method used to analyze the therapy was Dialogical Investigations of Happenings of Change (DIHC). Results on dominance indicated that the male client showed more quantitative dominance, whereas semantic dominance was more present in the female client, and therapists used more interactional dominance. Results on dialogue analysis showed that dialogical dialogue might help to construct a new-shared meaning of the issue of violence. In the Discussion section some research and clinical implications of the results are derived.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)223-232
    JournalContemporary Family Therapy
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016


    • Couple therapy
    • Dialogical approach
    • DIHC (Dialogical Investigations of Happenings of Change)
    • Dominance
    • IPV
    • Psychological partner violence


    Dive into the research topics of 'Dominance and Dialogue in Couple Therapy for Psychological Intimate Partner Violence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this