Do we all mean the same when we talk about participation? Perspectives of local officials, politicians & social activists revealed through Q-methodology

Ramon Canal

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The article analyses and compares the thinking on citizen participation of elected and non-elected officials, as well as social activists of the Spanish cities of Madrid, Barcelona, San Sebastián and Lleida. The research is based on Q methodology, whose combination of quantitative and qualitative elements can generate systematic, rigorous and quantifiable evidence, without sacrificing the complexity and richness of language. The results reveal three distinct perspectives on participation (integral, regenerative and distrustful), that differ notably in their appreciation of political institutions and social organizations. However, results also point to the existence of a core of consensus beliefs, which opens the door to building more legitimate and effective participatory institutions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)23-40
    JournalRevista Espanola de Investigaciones Sociologicas
    Volume158
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017

    Keywords

    • Associations
    • Citizen participation
    • Democracy
    • Discourse analysis
    • Local politics
    • Research methodology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Do we all mean the same when we talk about participation? Perspectives of local officials, politicians & social activists revealed through Q-methodology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this