Differential functional role of purinergic and nitrergic inhibitory cotransmitters in human colonic relaxation

N. Mañé, V. Gil, M. Martínez-Cutillas, P. Clavé, D. Gallego, M. Jiménez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2014 Scandinavian Physiological Society. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Aim: ATP and nitric oxide (NO) are released from enteric inhibitory motor neurones and are responsible for colonic smooth muscle relaxation. However, how frequency of neural stimulation affects this cotransmission process and the post-junctional responses has not been systematically characterized in the human colon. Methods: The dynamics of inhibitory cotransmission were studied using different protocols of electrical field stimulation (EFS) to characterize the inhibitory junction potentials (IJP) and the corresponding relaxation in colonic strips obtained from 36 patients. Results: Single pulses elicited a fast IJP (IJPf<inf>MAX</inf> = -27.6 ± 1.6 mV), sensitive to the P2Y<inf>1</inf> antagonist MRS2500 1 μm, that ran down with frequency increase leaving a residual hyperpolarization at high frequencies (IJPf<inf>∞</inf> = -3.7 ± 0.6 mV). Accordingly, low frequencies of EFS caused purinergic transient relaxations that cannot be maintained at high frequencies. Addition of the P2Y<inf>1</inf> agonist MRS2365 10 μm during the purinergic rundown did not cause any hyperpolarization. Protein kinase C (PKC), a putative P2Y<inf>1</inf> desensitizator, was able to reduce the amplitude of the IJPf when activated, but the rundown was not modified by PKC inhibitors. Frequencies higher than 0.60 ± 0.15 Hz were needed to evoke a sustained nitrergic hyperpolarization that progressively increased reaching IJPs<inf>∞</inf> = -13 ± 0.4 mV at high frequencies and leading to a sustained inhibition of spontaneous motility. Conclusion: Changes in frequency of stimulation possibly mimicking neuronal firing will post-junctionally determine purinergic vs. nitrergic responses underlying different functional roles. NO will be responsible for sustained relaxations needed in physiological processes such as storage, while purinergic neurotransmission evoking sharp transient relaxations will be dominant in processes such as propulsion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)293-305
JournalActa Physiologica
Volume212
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Keywords

  • Enteric neurones
  • Inhibitory junction potential
  • Propulsion
  • Relaxation
  • Smooth muscle
  • Storage

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Differential functional role of purinergic and nitrergic inhibitory cotransmitters in human colonic relaxation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this