Diagnóstico incidental del carcinoma vesical

Joan Griñó Garreta, Óscar ́ Bielsa Galí, Ramón Cortadellas Ángel, Octavio Arango Toro, Antoni Gelabert-Mas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review


OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prognostic factors of incidentally diagnosed bladder carcinomas with special reference to the complementary diagnostic tests. METHODS: 308 cases of carcinoma of the bladder were reviewed. These were divided into two groups: those that had been diagnosed on the basis of the clinical features and those that had been incidentally detected. The prognostic factors of size, grade, histological type, and pathological stage were analyzed. RESULTS: Local tumor stage was the only statistically significant prognostic factor. 14.7% of the superficial and 3.6% of the infiltrating carcinomas had been incidentally diagnosed. Ultrasound was the most frequently utilized diagnostic method (87.2%). CONCLUSIONS: In our series, the incidentally diagnosed carcinoma of the bladder has a higher probability of being a superficial lesion than those that are symptomatic and therefore the prognosis is better. Since ultrasound was the most frequently utilized diagnostic method, it might be advisable to assess the bladder in patients undergoing abdominal ultrasound evaluation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)709-712
JournalArchivos Espanoles de Urologia
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2000


  • Bladder carcinoma
  • Incidental
  • Prognostic factors
  • Symptoms
  • Ultrasonography


Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnóstico incidental del carcinoma vesical'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this