TY - JOUR
T1 - Detecting Hot Spots of Methane Flux Using Footprint-Weighted Flux Maps
AU - Rey-Sanchez, Camilo
AU - Arias-Ortiz, Ariane
AU - Kasak, Kuno
AU - Chu, Housen
AU - Szutu, Daphne
AU - Verfaillie, Joseph
AU - Baldocchi, Dennis
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) through a contract from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the United States Department of Agriculture (grant #2011-67003-30371). Funding for the AmeriFlux core sites was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science (AmeriFlux contract #7079856). We also acknowledge support from NASA's ECOSTRESS mission, sponsor 005101 NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration Miscellaneous Centers awarded to PI Dennis Baldocchi. DDB was supported by University of California Agricultural Experiment Station, McIntire-Stennis Program and from NSF and NCAR for the Walker Branch measurements. AA-O was supported by the NOAA C&GC Postdoctoral Fellowship Program administered by UCAR-CPAESS (#NA18NWS4620043B). KK was supported by the Estonian Research Council (grants no PSG631 and PSG714). We thank Robert Shortt, Julie Shahan and Patty Oikawa for their assistance with the chamber measurements. We thank the contributions of an anonymous reviewer and the editor of the journal that resulted in important improvements to the presentation and interpretation of the results.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) through a contract from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the United States Department of Agriculture (grant #2011‐67003‐30371). Funding for the AmeriFlux core sites was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science (AmeriFlux contract #7079856). We also acknowledge support from NASA's ECOSTRESS mission, sponsor 005101 NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration Miscellaneous Centers awarded to PI Dennis Baldocchi. DDB was supported by University of California Agricultural Experiment Station, McIntire‐Stennis Program and from NSF and NCAR for the Walker Branch measurements. AA‐O was supported by the NOAA C&GC Postdoctoral Fellowship Program administered by UCAR‐CPAESS (#NA18NWS4620043B). KK was supported by the Estonian Research Council (grants no PSG631 and PSG714). We thank Robert Shortt, Julie Shahan and Patty Oikawa for their assistance with the chamber measurements. We thank the contributions of an anonymous reviewer and the editor of the journal that resulted in important improvements to the presentation and interpretation of the results.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors.
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - In this study, we propose a new technique for mapping the spatial heterogeneity in gas exchange around flux towers using flux footprint modeling and focusing on detecting hot spots of methane (CH4) flux. In the first part of the study, we used a CH4 release experiment to evaluate three common flux footprint models: the Hsieh model (Hsieh et al., 2000), the Kljun model (Kljun et al., 2015), and the K & M model (Kormann and Meixner, 2001), finding that the K & M model was the most accurate under these conditions. In the second part of the study, we introduce the Footprint-Weighted Flux Map, a new technique to map spatial heterogeneity in fluxes. Using artificial CH4 release experiments, natural tracer approaches and flux chambers we mapped the spatial flux heterogeneity, and detected and validated a hot spot of CH4 flux in a oligohaline restored marsh. Through chamber measurements during the months of April and May, we found that fluxes at the hot spot were on average as high as 6589 ± 7889 nmol m−2 s−1 whereas background flux from the open water were on average 15.2 ± 7.5 nmol m−2 s−1. This study provides a novel tool to evaluate the spatial heterogeneity of fluxes around eddy-covariance towers and creates important insights for the interpretation of hot spots of CH4 flux, paving the way for future studies aiming to understand subsurface biogeochemical processes and the microbiological conditions that lead to the occurrence of hot spots and hot moments of CH4 flux.
AB - In this study, we propose a new technique for mapping the spatial heterogeneity in gas exchange around flux towers using flux footprint modeling and focusing on detecting hot spots of methane (CH4) flux. In the first part of the study, we used a CH4 release experiment to evaluate three common flux footprint models: the Hsieh model (Hsieh et al., 2000), the Kljun model (Kljun et al., 2015), and the K & M model (Kormann and Meixner, 2001), finding that the K & M model was the most accurate under these conditions. In the second part of the study, we introduce the Footprint-Weighted Flux Map, a new technique to map spatial heterogeneity in fluxes. Using artificial CH4 release experiments, natural tracer approaches and flux chambers we mapped the spatial flux heterogeneity, and detected and validated a hot spot of CH4 flux in a oligohaline restored marsh. Through chamber measurements during the months of April and May, we found that fluxes at the hot spot were on average as high as 6589 ± 7889 nmol m−2 s−1 whereas background flux from the open water were on average 15.2 ± 7.5 nmol m−2 s−1. This study provides a novel tool to evaluate the spatial heterogeneity of fluxes around eddy-covariance towers and creates important insights for the interpretation of hot spots of CH4 flux, paving the way for future studies aiming to understand subsurface biogeochemical processes and the microbiological conditions that lead to the occurrence of hot spots and hot moments of CH4 flux.
KW - chambers
KW - eddy covariance
KW - flux footprint
KW - hot spots
KW - methane
KW - wetlands
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137065764&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2022JG006977
DO - 10.1029/2022JG006977
M3 - Article
C2 - 36248720
AN - SCOPUS:85137065764
SN - 2169-8953
VL - 127
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
IS - 8
M1 - e2022JG006977
ER -