Abstract
It is thought that the controlled trial (CT) is the most adequate research method to assess a therapeutic intervention in terms of efficacy, and it also constitutes the basis for the development of systematic reviews on health interventions. To identify and obtain the majority of published CTs is not an easy task, mainly because of limitations concerning the currently available electronic sources. The aim of the present work was to identify, describe, and assess the quality of CTs published in the journal Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology (M&F). Additionally, to assess the retrievability of both methods, a search was performed in Medline (PubMed access) through the use of an optimal search strategy for CTs. A total of 189 original studies out of a total of 2796 reviewed articles met the CT criteria according to the Jadad scale score, we could hold that only 58% of the CTs were of good quality. The present work confirms, once again, the limitations of a CT search performed exclusively through Medline (sensitivity 64% and specificity 98%). In conclusion, we suggest that the journal M&F explicitly joins the International CONSORT Statement. © 2006 Prous Science. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 527-531 |
| Journal | Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2006 |
Keywords
- Controlled clinical trial
- Evidence-based medicine
- Handsearching
- Publication bias
- Systematic reviews
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Description of controlled trials published in methods and findings, 1979-2002'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Garcia-Alamino, J. M., Perrotta, C., Clopés, A., Parera, A., Pérez-de-la-Ossa, N., & Bonfill, X. (2006). Description of controlled trials published in methods and findings, 1979-2002. Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, 28(8), 527-531.