Degrowth, democracy and autonomy

Viviana Asara, Emanuele Profumi, Giorgos Kallis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

55 Citations (Scopus)


The quest for real democracy is one of the components of sustainable degrowth. But the incipient debate on democracy and degrowth suffers from general definitions and limited connections to political philosophy and democracy theory. This article offers a critical review of democracy theory within the degrowth literature, taking as its focal point a relevant debate between Serge Latouche and Takis Fotopoulos. We argue that the core of their contention can be traced back to the relationship between the concepts of democracy and autonomy as defined by philosopher Cornelius Castoriadis, which both authors and generally the degrowth movement consider as one of their theoretical reference points. We show how both Latouche and Fotopoulos hold a misconception of Castoriadis' notions of autonomy, the social imaginary and politics, which in turn limits their cognisance of democracy and hence confuses their debate concerning the possibilities for a degrowth transition within the confines of a liberal parliamentary democracy. With a clarified theoretical understanding of the interconnected democracy-autonomy assemble, we proceed to an evaluation of the revolutionary potential of the degrowth movement and to a better understanding of a possible relationship between democracy and degrowth. © 2013 The White Horse Press.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-239
JournalEnvironmental Values
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2013


  • Autonomy
  • Castoriadis
  • Degrowth
  • Democracy
  • Direct democracy
  • Revolution
  • Social imaginary


Dive into the research topics of 'Degrowth, democracy and autonomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this