Cubic versus spherical magnetic nanoparticles: The role of surface anisotropy

G. Salazar-Alvarez, J. Qin, V. Šepelák, I. Bergmann, M. Vasilakaki, K. N. Trohidou, J. D. Ardisson, W. A.A. Macedo, M. Mikhaylova, M. Muhammed, M. D. Baró, J. Nogués

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

204 Citations (Scopus)


The magnetic properties of maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) cubic and spherical nanoparticles of similar sizes have been experimentally and theoretically studied. The blocking temperature, TB, of the nanoparticles depends on their shape, with the spherical ones exhibiting larger TB. Other low temperature properties such as saturation magnetization, coercivity, loop shift or spin canting are rather similar. The experimental effective anisotropy and the Monte Carlo simulations indicate that the different random surface anisotropy of the two morphologies combined with the low magnetocrystalline anisotropy of γ-Fe2O3 is the origin of these effects. © 2008 American Chemical Society.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13234-13239
JournalJournal of the American Chemical Society
Publication statusPublished - 8 Oct 2008


Dive into the research topics of 'Cubic versus spherical magnetic nanoparticles: The role of surface anisotropy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this