Conversational markers in public service interpreting: A matter of omissions and additions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

According to Wang (2013, p. 130), conversational markers are linguistic elements performing a double role: informational and interactive. In their second role, they are used to regulate interaction between participants in a conversation, in transitioning to another topic, when stating speaker's attitude, and so on. Therefore, they perform a significant role in any oral exchange. However, what does it happen to conversational markers when that oral exchange is made possible by an interpreter? In research on public service interpreting, the study of conversational markers has been rather anecdotal and, except for some exceptions within the judicial sphere, our knowledge on the treatment this discourse markers receive in interpreting is scarce. This paper presents the study of a conversation interpreted by a mediator-interpreter in public services in the Chinese- Catalan language pair, which was recorded and subsequently transcribed verbatim in order to make analysis easier. The results reflect an omission of all conversational markers the primary interlocutors (a high school teacher and a Chinese student's mother) had been using, as well as the addition, by the mediator- interpreter, of conversational markers that were absent in the original message. In the conclusions, I will reflect upon the potential implications of these results, and on the prospective value of this study.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)387-403
JournalIkala
Volume22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2017

Keywords

  • Conversational markers
  • Discourse markers
  • Intercultural mediation
  • Interpretation in public services

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Conversational markers in public service interpreting: A matter of omissions and additions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this