Controlled crude glycerol dosage to prevent EBPR failures in C/N/P removal WWTPs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

© 2015 Elsevier B.V. Enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) failure due to nitrate/nitrite presence in the anaerobic reactor is a common problem in full-scale WWTPs aiming at simultaneous C/N/P removal. This work evaluates the performance of two common EBPR configurations (A2/O and JHB) under normal conditions and under two detrimental scenarios: (i) increase of ammonium nitrogen in the influent and (ii) increase of nitrite in the external recycle. EBPR failure due to nitrate/nitrite entering the anaerobic phase can be avoided with a controlled addition of a carbon source. In this work, crude glycerol, a biodiesel by-product, was used as a low-cost external carbon source. A control strategy to dose an optimal amount of crude glycerol was theoretically designed through a modelling-based study. Hence, a model was firstly calibrated and validated with the open-loop experimental data. Then, the optimal control strategy was experimentally evaluated in the pilot plant under both configurations and under the same detrimental scenarios revealing the real benefits of the control action. JHB obtained the best results under open- and closed-loop conditions: P was satisfactorily controlled with 18% less crude glycerol dosage than A2/O. Finally, two control alternatives were tested in silico to overcome problems derived from the slow dynamics of P effluent concentration with respect to glycerol addition resulting in a better control performance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)114-127
JournalChemical Engineering Journal
Volume271
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2015

Keywords

  • Biological nutrient removal
  • Control
  • Crude glycerol
  • EBPR
  • Wastewater treatment plant

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Controlled crude glycerol dosage to prevent EBPR failures in C/N/P removal WWTPs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this