Abstract
Recently, several school districts in the US have adopted or consider adopting the Student-Optimal Stable mechanism or the Top Trading Cycles mechanism to assign children to public schools. There is evidence that for school districts that employ (variants of) the so-called Boston mechanism the transition would lead to efficiency gains. The first two mechanisms are strategy-proof, but in practice student assignment procedures typically impede a student to submit a preference list that contains all his acceptable schools. We study the preference revelation game where students can only declare up to a fixed number of schools to be acceptable. We focus on the stability and efficiency of the Nash equilibrium outcomes. Our main results identify rather stringent necessary and sufficient conditions on the priorities to guarantee stability or efficiency of either of the two mechanisms. This stands in sharp contrast with the Boston mechanism which has been abandoned in many US school districts but nevertheless yields stable Nash equilibrium outcomes. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1921-1947 |
Journal | Journal of Economic Theory |
Volume | 144 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sep 2009 |
Keywords
- Acyclic priority structure
- Boston mechanism
- Efficiency
- Gale-Shapley deferred acceptance algorithm
- Matching
- Nash equilibrium
- School choice
- Stability
- Top Trading Cycles