Comparison of Single- and Double-Stage Designs in the Prevalence Estimation of Eating Disorders in Community Samples

Rosa Maria Raich Escursell, MA Peláez-Fernández, FJ Labrador, RM Raich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this research was to compare two different case-identification designs: (a) a one-stage anonymous design using the Eating Disorders Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q; Fairburn & Beglin, 1994) as diagnostic instrument and (b) a two-stage-non-anonymous design using the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT; Garner & Garfinkel, 1979) and the EDE-Q as screening instruments and the clinical interview Eating Disorders Examination (EDE; Fairburn & Cooper, 1993) as diagnostic instrument, in the estimation of eating disorders prevalence in community samples. Both epidemiological designs were compared in: eating disorders prevalence, population at risk, and weekly frequency of associated symptomatology (binge eating episodes, self-vomiting) within a sample of 559 scholars (14 to 18 year-old males and females) studying in the region of Madrid. Eating disorders prevalence estimation using single-stage design was 6.2%, and 3% using the two-stage design; however, these differences were not significant (p = .067). No significant differences between the two procedures were found either in population at risk or in weekly frequency of reported self-vomiting. Reported binge eating episodes were higher in the one-stage design. The use of a two-stage procedure with clinical interview (vs. questionnaire) leads to a better understanding of the items (specially the most ambiguous ones) and thus, to a more accurate prevalence estimation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)542-550
JournalSpanish Journal of Psychology
Volume11
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2008

Keywords

  • Case-identification design
  • Eating disorders
  • One-stage design
  • Prevalence
  • Two-stage design

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Single- and Double-Stage Designs in the Prevalence Estimation of Eating Disorders in Community Samples'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this