Comparison of ecosystem functional type patterns at different spatial resolutions in relation with FLUXNET data

L. Pesquer, C. Domingo-Marimon, J. Cristóbal, C. Ottlé, P. Peylin, F. Bovolo, L. Bruzzone

Research output: Chapter in BookChapterResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The present study aims at analyzing the role of spatial resolution in Ecosystem Functional Types (EFT) time series' patterns by comparing their spatial variability, retrieved at 300 m (MERIS products) and 30 m (Landsat products) of spatial resolution, with time series of Fluxnet in situ measurements, such as gross primary production (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET). EFT maps at both spatial resolutions for 2005 and 2009 year in Sudan study region were generated, with a classification system of 64 categories. However, the 50% of the study area was covered by four representative EFTs. The main result at fine spatial resolution, related to the 2005-2009 comparison, shows a clear pattern of vegetation with high productivity and low seasonality in both years. At coarse spatial resolution, EFTs located in shrublands or forests regions are more difficult to be clearly detected. The presented methodology is absolutely replicable for using Sentinel-2 (MSI) images and Lansat-8 (OLI) in cases where the data availability of fluxnet database reaches the Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 active period.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRemote Sensing for Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Hydrology XXI
EditorsChristopher M. U. Neale, Antonino Maltese
Place of PublicationBellingham
ISBN (Electronic)9781510630017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Oct 2019

Publication series

NameProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
Volume11149
ISSN (Print)0277-786X
ISSN (Electronic)1996-756X

Keywords

  • Ecosystem Functional Type
  • FLUXNET
  • Spatial Resolution
  • Time series
  • Vegetation Index

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of ecosystem functional type patterns at different spatial resolutions in relation with FLUXNET data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this