Comparison of different vaccination schedules for sustaining the immune response against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus

I. Díaz, M. Gimeno, A. Callén, J. Pujols, S. López, C. Charreyre, F. Joisel, E. Mateu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to better understand how immunization against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) can be improved using commercial vaccines, different strategies of immunization were applied in the field using an inactivated vaccine (INV), a modified live vaccine (MLV) or a combination of the two and the responses compared. In experiment 1 (E1), 21 piglets were distributed in three groups. Group A was vaccinated with a commercial INV at 2.5, 3.5 and 6.5. months old; group B pigs received the INV at 1.5, 2.5, 5.5 and 6.5. months old, while pigs in group C were kept as unvaccinated controls. At 7.5. months of age all pigs were challenged with PRRSV and followed for 21. days. In experiment 2 (E2), 32 piglets were distributed evenly in four groups. Groups A, B and C were vaccinated with a commercial MLV at 1.5. months old, while group D pigs were kept as controls. At 4.5. months old, groups A and C received the INV while B received a second MLV, 1. month later group C pigs received a third INV. At 6.5. months old all pigs were challenged as in E1. In both experiments, total antibodies, neutralizing antibodies (NA) and cell-mediated immunity (CMI) were evaluated, and viraemia was determined after challenge. In E1, immunization with an INV induced high interferon-γ responses after the second and subsequent vaccinations. Development of NA after challenge was faster in INV vaccinated pigs compared to unvaccinated controls. In E2, re-vaccination with INV induced NA responses similar to re-vaccination with MLV; however, a significant increase in NA titres after challenge was only detected in group C pigs. The use of combined protocols (MLV. +. INV) was superior to the use of MLV alone in inducing cell mediated immunity. In conclusion, the highest immune responses against PRRSV after a single shot were achieved with MLV; after that, INV re-vaccination should be considered as the best strategy to induce significant boosters. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)438-444
JournalVeterinary Journal
Volume197
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2013

Keywords

  • Cell-mediated immunity
  • Neutralizing antibodies
  • Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome
  • Vaccination

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of different vaccination schedules for sustaining the immune response against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this