Comparing nutritional value and yield as functional units in the environmental assessment of horticultural production with organic or mineral fertilization : the case of Mediterranean cauliflower production

Julia Martínez-Blanco, Assumpció Antón, Joan Rieradevall, Massimo Castellari, Pere Muñoz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background, aim, and scope: We report the environmental assessment of the cultivation cycle of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis), chosen due to its high levels of natural bioactive compounds, using different fertilization practices. The functional units used during the impact assessment were linked with the quantity produced, considering different units of commercialization, or with the cauliflower quality, considering its antioxidant compounds content. Although nutrient content has been described and used as a possible functional unit, using antioxidant compounds as a functional unit has not previously been published. Method: Three cultivation options with similar dosages of total nitrogen were considered: using mineral fertilizers (M) alone or mineral fertilizers plus compost, with a high (CH) or a low (CL) dosage. During the cultivation period, the soil characteristics and nitrogen and moisture content of the fruit were monitored, and the yield and the fruit size were analyzed. In addition, the glucosinolates and the phenolic compounds (sinapic acid, phenols, and flavonoids) content were assessed for the three options. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was used to determine the environmental impacts of the whole cauliflower production cycle, including production of mineral and organic fertilizers, fertilizers transport, and crop stage. Results and discussion: Commercial yields were higher for cultivation options with M and CL than for option CH, while higher levels of bioactive compounds were detected in the latter. For CH and CL, eutrophication, global warming and ozone layer depletion potentials were generally lower and photochemical oxidation potential was always higher than for the M option, regardless of the functional unit. Regarding functional units involving production (yield, fruit and dry matter harvest), there were higher impacts with the CH cultivation option than with M for abiotic depletion, acidification, photochemical oxidation, and cumulative energy demand. When the differences in bioactive compounds content (total sinapic acid derivatives and total phenols) were sufficiently high, this was reversed, with CH having lower impacts for all the environmental categories apart from photochemical oxidation and abiotic depletion. Conclusions and perspectives: The differences in the magnitude of individual environmental impacts between cultivation options, and also the order, were highly dependant on the functional unit considered. When functional units associated with production and total phenols content were considered, the CH cultivation option had the highest impact in four out of seven categories, whereas for the functional unit involving sinapic acid content, this cultivation option had the least impact in five out of seven categories. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12-26
JournalInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Volume16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2011

Keywords

  • Compost
  • Food products
  • Functional unit
  • Life cycle assessment
  • Mineral fertilizers
  • Nutritional compounds

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing nutritional value and yield as functional units in the environmental assessment of horticultural production with organic or mineral fertilization : the case of Mediterranean cauliflower production'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this