Coexistence of plants and coexistence of farmers: Is an individual choice possible?

Rosa Binimelis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

41 Citations (Scopus)


The introduction of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Europe has been characterized by controversy. In 2002, the European Union introduced the concept of "coexistence" as a compromise solution that, through the establishment of science-based technical measures, should allow the market to operate freely while reducing policy conflicts on GMOs. However, the concept remains highly contested and the technical measures difficult to apply. This paper presents qualitative research on the conceptualization and implementation of the coexistence framework in two regions of Spain (Catalonia and Aragon), where 42% and 55% of maize was GM in 2006, respectively. In this context, the concept of coexistence and its proposed implementation both fail to resolve previous conflicts and actually work to generate new ones through the individualization of choice and impacts. Considerations of the social conditions in which the technology and the management measures are implemented were not taken into account. This resulted in the promotion of biotechnological agriculture over other alternatives. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)437-457
JournalJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 7 May 2008


  • Coexistence
  • GMOs
  • Liability
  • Maize
  • Organic agriculture
  • Spain


Dive into the research topics of 'Coexistence of plants and coexistence of farmers: Is an individual choice possible?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this