Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin versus cloxacillin alone for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia : a randomized trial

Sara Grillo, Miquel Pujol, José M Miró, Joaquín López-Contreras, Gorane Euba, Oriol Gasch Blasi, Lucía Boix-Palop, Maria José Garcia-País, Maria Teresa Pérez-Rodríguez, Silvia Gómez-Zorrilla, Isabel Oriol, Luis Eduardo López-Cortés, Maria Luisa Pedro-Botet, Rafael San-Juan, José María Aguado, Francesca Gioia, Simona Iftimie, Laura Morata, Alfredo Jover-Sáenz, Graciano García-PardoBelén Loeches, Álvaro Izquierdo-Cárdenas, Ane Josune Goikoetxea, Aina Gomila Grange, Beatriz Dietl, Dàmaris Berbel, Sebastián Videla, Pilar Hereu, Ariadna Padullés, Natalia Pallarès, Cristian Tebé, Guillermo Cuervo, Jordi Carratalà

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Treatment failure occurs in about 25% of patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. We assessed whether cloxacillin plus fosfomycin achieves better treatment success than cloxacillin alone in hospitalized adults with MSSA bacteremia. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase III-IV superiority randomized clinical trial. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive 2 g of intravenous cloxacillin alone every 4 h or with 3 g of intravenous fosfomycin every 6 h for the initial 7 days. The primary endpoint was treatment success at day 7, a composite endpoint with the following criteria: patient alive, stable or with improved quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, afebrile and with negative blood cultures for MSSA, adjudicated by an independent committee blinded to treatment allocation. We randomized 215 patients, of whom 105 received cloxacillin plus fosfomycin and 110 received cloxacillin alone. We analyzed the primary endpoint with the intention-to-treat approach in 214 patients who received at least 1 day of treatment. Treatment success at day 7 after randomization was achieved in 83 (79.8%) of 104 patients receiving combination treatment versus 82 (74.5%) of 110 patients receiving monotherapy (risk difference 5.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -5.95-16.48). Secondary endpoints, including mortality and adverse events, were similar in the two groups except for persistent bacteremia at day 3, which was less common in the combination arm. In a prespecified interim analysis, the independent committee recommended stopping recruitment for futility prior to meeting the planned randomization of 366 patients. Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin did not achieve better treatment success at day 7 of therapy than cloxacillin alone in MSSA bacteremia. Further trials should consider the intrinsic heterogeneity of the infection by using a more personalized approach. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: . New treatments are essential for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, but progress is slow. In this phase III-IV trial, cloxacillin plus fosfomycin failed to show superiority over cloxacillin alone, underscoring the challenges to improving patient outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2518-2525
Number of pages8
JournalNature Medicine
Volume29
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Antimicrobial therapy
  • Randomized controlled trials

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin versus cloxacillin alone for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia : a randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this