TY - JOUR
T1 - Climate, peace, and conflict—past and present: Bridging insights from historical sciences and contemporary research
AU - White, Sam
AU - Collet, Dominik
AU - ALCOBERRO, AGUSTÍ
AU - Barriendos, Mariano
AU - Brázdil, Rudolf
AU - Castell, Pau
AU - Chen, Siyu
AU - de Coning, Cedric
AU - Degroot, Dagomar
AU - Dolák, Lukáš
AU - Döring, Stefan
AU - Gorostiza, Santiago
AU - Kleemann, Katrin
AU - Krampe, Florian
AU - Lin, Kuan-Hui
AU - Maughan, Nicolas
AU - Melo, Natália
AU - Molloy, Barry
AU - Ogilvie, Astrid E. J.
AU - Pai, Piling
AU - Pei, Qing
AU - Pfister, Christian
AU - Serafimova, Silviya
AU - Zhang, Diyang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/2/4
Y1 - 2025/2/4
N2 - Concern has risen that current global warming and more frequent extreme events such as droughts and floods will increase conflict around the world. This concern has spurred both social science research on contemporary climate, peace, and conflict as well as research in the historical sciences on past climate, weather, warfare, and violence. This perspectives article compares these two fields of scholarship and examines how each may benefit the other. It finds significant convergences in methods and insights across contemporary and historical research as well as persistent patterns in causal pathways between climate and conflict. Contemporary climate, peace, and conflict (CPC) research may sharpen methods and causal models for historical researchers. Historical studies, particularly those informed by contemporary research, may elucidate deep origins and long-term effects of climate-related conflicts. For policymakers and the public, history offers comprehensible ways to make sense of complex and contingent linkages and to construct cogent narratives of the past as well as storylines for the future.
AB - Concern has risen that current global warming and more frequent extreme events such as droughts and floods will increase conflict around the world. This concern has spurred both social science research on contemporary climate, peace, and conflict as well as research in the historical sciences on past climate, weather, warfare, and violence. This perspectives article compares these two fields of scholarship and examines how each may benefit the other. It finds significant convergences in methods and insights across contemporary and historical research as well as persistent patterns in causal pathways between climate and conflict. Contemporary climate, peace, and conflict (CPC) research may sharpen methods and causal models for historical researchers. Historical studies, particularly those informed by contemporary research, may elucidate deep origins and long-term effects of climate-related conflicts. For policymakers and the public, history offers comprehensible ways to make sense of complex and contingent linkages and to construct cogent narratives of the past as well as storylines for the future.
KW - Archaeology
KW - Climate change
KW - Conflict
KW - History
KW - Peace
KW - Science communication
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85218850098&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/ee84188a-d300-3020-8955-be494f3a79a4/
U2 - 10.1007/s13280-024-02109-1
DO - 10.1007/s13280-024-02109-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 39903377
SN - 0044-7447
VL - 54
SP - 774
EP - 792
JO - Ambio
JF - Ambio
M1 - e518
ER -