Bracketing phenogenotypic limits of mammalian hybridization

Yoland Savriama, Mia Valtonen, Juhana I. Kammonen, Pasi Rastas, Olli Pekka Smolander, Annina Lyyski, Teemu J. Häkkinen, Ian J. Corfe, Sylvain Gerber, Isaac Salazar-Ciudad, Lars Paulin, Liisa Holm, Ari Löytynoja, Petri Auvinen, Jukka Jernvall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

10 Citations (Scopus)


© 2018 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License An increasing number of mammalian species have been shown to have a history of hybridization and introgression based on genetic analyses. Only relatively few fossils, however, preserve genetic material, and morphology must be used to identify the species and determine whether morphologically intermediate fossils could represent hybrids. Because dental and cranial fossils are typically the key body parts studied in mammalian palaeontology, here we bracket the potential for phenotypically extreme hybridizations by examining uniquely preserved cranio-dental material of a captive hybrid between grey and ringed seals. We analysed how distinct these species are genetically and morphologically, how easy it is to identify the hybrids using morphology and whether comparable hybridizations happen in the wild. We show that the genetic distance between these species is more than twice the modern human – Neanderthal distance, but still within that of morphologically similar species pairs known to hybridize. By contrast, morphological and developmental analyses show grey and ringed seals to be highly disparate, and that the hybrid is a predictable intermediate. Genetic analyses of the parent
Original languageEnglish
Article number180903
JournalRoyal Society Open Science
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018


  • Dental
  • Developmental conservation
  • Disparity
  • Introgression
  • Morphology
  • Species hybridization


Dive into the research topics of 'Bracketing phenogenotypic limits of mammalian hybridization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this